Sargon vs. USC

Sargon Enterprises Inc. vs University of Southern California

  • Home
  • When it Started
    • The Contract
    • The Protocol
    • Symposium at Monte Carlo
  • The Lawsuit
    • Motion to Amend the Complaint
    • USC Reports
    • Reasons for Termination of Study
    • Internal Review Board
    • Depositions
    • Patient Record Alterations
    • Noble Biocare Factor
  • USC’s Sargon Study Results
    • USC Counterclaims
    • Dr. Abou Rass Speaks Out
    • Dean Landesman Speaks Out
    • Settlement Offer by USC
    • Juror Declarations
    • Opening Brief to Court of Appeal
    • USC’s Respondent’s Brief
    • Sargon Reply Brief to Court of Appeal
    • Court of Appeal Opinion
    • USC’s Supreme Court Petition
    • Sargon Answer Brief
    • Supreme Court Denial
    • Attorney Fees Ruling
    • Nowzari pays for court judgment against himself
    • Settlement Offer by USC
    • Stipulated Judgment
    • Dean Slavkin’s email to Faculty
    • Sargon's Appellant Opening Brief
  • Court of Appeal Ruling
  • Videos
    • Dr. Winston Chee Video
    • Dr. Terrance Donovan's Deposition Video
    • BraneBill's Deposition Video
    • BraneBill's Admission Video
    • BraneBill's Statement about Sargon Video
    • Nowzari's FDA Report Video
    • Nowzari-Lazarof Reason Video
    • Nowzari's French Study Video
    • Nowzari Caught Video
    • Nowzari's Patient Records Video
    • Nowzari's Record Back-Dating Video
  • Contact Us

Settlement Offer by USC

PDF | Print | E-mail

Settlement Offer by USC

Even though these letters were initially designated confidential, Sargon made a motion to de-designate the confidentiality of all letters between the council. This was agreed to by USC prior to the hearing of this motion by the court.

1

1

1

1

1

Copyright © 2012. All Rights Reserved.